Anubhav Ratha

Are electricity markets fit for the purpose of acting as a catalyst to accelerate the clean energy transition? Are they sending the right signals for the massive investments necessary in the energy sector to rapidly scale up renewable energy deployment across the world? The stakes couldn’t be higher - urgent and large-scale electrification of all energy use supported by a deep decarbonisation of the electricity sector is essential to mitigate climate change. In this article, we dive deep into the economics of the electricity sector in an attempt to find answers to above questions. We highlight the challenges renewable energy projects face and the role that electricity markets can and must play to facilitate rapid, large-scale decarbonisation of energy systems. Without going too much into technical details, we discuss some policy interventions and market adaptations in broad strokes to overcome these limitations.

A competitive market is modeled as a game of incomplete information. One player observes some payoff-relevant state and can sell (possibly noisy) messages thereof to the other, whose willingness to pay is contingent on their own beliefs. We frame the decision of what information to sell, and at what price, as a product versioning problem. The optimal menu screens buyer types to maximize profit, which is the payment minus the externality induced by selling information to a competitor, that is, the cost of refining a competitor’s beliefs. For a class of games with binary actions and states, we derive the following insights: (i) payments are necessary to provide incentives for information sharing amongst competing firms; (ii) the optimal menu benefits both the buyer and the seller; (iii) the seller cannot steer the buyer’s actions at the expense of social welfare; (iv) as such, as competition grows fiercer it can be optimal to sell no information at all.

We propose a new forward electricity market framework that admits heterogeneous market participants with second-order cone strategy sets, who accurately express the nonlinearities in their costs and constraints through conic bids, and a network operator facing conic operational constraints. In contrast to the prevalent linear-programming-based electricity markets, we highlight how the inclusion of second-order cone constraints improves uncertainty-, asset- and network-awareness of the market, which is key to the successful transition towards an electricity system based on weather-dependent renewable energy sources. We analyze our general market-clearing proposal using conic duality theory to derive efficient spatially-differentiated prices for the multiple commodities, comprising of energy and flexibility services. Under the assumption of perfect competition, we prove the equivalence of the centrally-solved market-clearing optimization problem to a competitive spatial price equilibrium involving a set of rational and self-interested participants and a price setter. Finally, under common assumptions, we prove that moving towards conic markets does not incur the loss of desirable economic properties of markets, namely market efficiency, cost recovery and revenue adequacy. Our numerical studies focus on the specific use case of uncertainty-aware market design and demonstrate that the proposed conic market brings advantages over existing alternatives within the linear programming market framework.